I don't think I ever got the packet with excerpts so I used this one from the IOC Reminders google slides.
How I scored my self: 14/30
Criterion A: 5
- I think that I showed a good understanding of the text and I usually went back and talked about the greater significance in the text.
Criterion B: 5
- I talked about a few literary devices but I feel there could've been more, but I did talk about effect on the reader a lot.
Criterion C: 2
- This wasn't well organized at all, I started out with a plan but then things kept popping into my head that I thought I needed to say.
Criterion D: 2
- I said "um" and "uh" a lot and I kept taking pauses causing broken sentences, so overall my grammar, sentence structure, and vocabulary just wasn't up to par.
Victoria:
ReplyDelete- Great pacing and tone
- Need more language and literary devices- strong examples that connect back to thesis/end result
- Short- what else could you bring up? Think about the big 5 from your IOC packet (I'll give you one if you don't have one) and from our Stranger passage analysis